Yahoo! Sponsored Search Minimum Bid Changes

Yahoo! began making changes to its minimum bid structure this week, which means it is the perfect time for advertisers to review and tweak their sponsored search ad campaigns. Yahoo! will be eliminating the fixed $.10 minimum bid in its Yahoo! Search Marketing platform in an effort to place more emphasis on keyword relevancy and value.

U.S. advertisers will face fluctuating minimum bids, which may be raised or lowered depending on two key factors: value and quality. The value of the keyword is determined by the number of bidders and their bid amounts in a particular keyword market. Quality refers to the relevance of the keywords, or how frequently users click on the ads associated with them relative to competing ads.

This modification echoes Google’s change in minimum bid structure a few years ago–a change that was initially met with some unhappiness from advertisers. Yahoo! is attempting to make the transition smoother with new features and alerts. Advertisers will be notified if their bid is about to drop below the minimum, and will have a “grace period” of a few days to raise their bid in order to keep keywords active.

Yahoo!’s minimum bid updates serve as a strong motivator for advertisers to keep their quality score high and their minimum bids low. There are several tips for achieving a high quality score, including:

• Grouping relevant keywords together
• Learning how to track ads so you can maximize their quality
• Serving a highly targeted ad that is relevant to each keyword
• Continuing the customer experience by directing traffic to the pertinent landing pages and content
• Continually monitoring bids and campaigns

With the right strategy, these changes could be the perfect opportunity to strengthen search campaigns and even save some money on pay per click advertising.

Article by Lauren Deppe

 

The UK Travel Search Market – Part 1 in a 3 part series

Consolidation in the UK Travel Market

There is perhaps no industry in the UK online space as diverse as travel. With such a wide range of products and a number of choices when it comes to booking (online, in store or on the phone) it can be a minefield when it comes to managing paid search. With the “Big 4” UK travel companies recently becoming the “Big 2,” and with mergers and acquisitions going on all over the place, the face of search changes on almost a daily basis. Thomas Cook merged with MyTravel whilst TUI, aka Thomson, merged with First Choice – both mergers will affect the wider travel markets and not just the UK. All 4 companies have overseas assets. The reasons for the mergers have been two-fold;

1)To cut overhead costs, through consolidations of staff, offices and retail shops

2)To decrease overall stock and capacity in a bid to boost profitability.

The package market is diminishing – fewer people are taking “traditional” package holidays to the “traditional” destinations – more people are either packaging their holidays themselves or turning to previously “niche” products such as experience/adventure holidays, as well as cruise or luxury product. There has also been a cultural shift in people taking more frequent, shorter holidays (e.g. city breaks) rather than one long holiday. Since the mergers, several acquisitions have been made by the consolidated groups to try and gain more of a hold in these growth markets. Google’s new ruling on trademark bidding is likely to shake things up further.

As well as using search engines to research and book their holidays via major operators, UK consumers are consistently starting to use meta-search sites (sites that have listings supplied either by means of a feed or other technology and who make their money charging for outbound clicks to client’s sites, e.g. Travel Supermarket) to conduct price comparison, visiting aggregators (sites like Hotels.com or Opodo who “aggregate” or combine lots of one particular product and operate on commission – they sell leads rather than product) to see as wide a choice as possible, and using online review sites to get recommendations and opinions on their potential choice.

Recent events, such as the purchase of HolidayWatchdog.com (a UK review site) by TripAdvisor, the purchase of Hotels4U.com (a hotel aggregator) by Thomas Cook, and even the purchase of TripAdvisor itself by Expedia all highlight the growing importance of these channels for consumers, and the role they play in the booking journey.

There have been many high profile TV campaigns designed to increase awareness and drive consumers online, and these appear to have had the desired impact. To try and take advantage of the extensive advertising being done by companies such as Travel Supermarket or Hotels.com, search executives should see what advertising opportunities are available on these and other sites. TripAdvisor, Travel Supermarket and Travel Zoo all offer text advertising that can be paid for on a CPC basis – rendering it paid search rather than anything else (although most of these sites do offer other advertising opportunities as well). The Travel Supermarket feeds also operate on a cost-per-click basis (you pay when a visitor clicks through from the search results to your website).

Article by Arianne Donoghue

 

Digg Insight

During this past week’s Diggnation podcast, Kevin Rose offered up some insight into the Digg algorithm which may or may not be the most eye-opening of revelations. It’s something that I figured out pretty quickly and that is that there is an element of time associated with how likely a submitted story is to be promoted to the homepage. Personally, I think there is a 24 hour window of opportunity as I’ve seen stories make it to the “Hot” list (at the right of this page, for example) and not be promoted to the homepage, yet be removed from this list after a full 24 hours.

What I haven’t been able to confirm is whether or not something older than 24 hours could possibly be promoted with an adequate number of diggs despite its age. Kevin’s comment: “It’s too old. The algo won’t promote it.” (skip ahead to 22:30 to hear it) sort of confirms that any submission beyond an age specified by the algorithm won’t be made popular. The story in question (related to SEO by strange coincidence), SEO Design Rap, only had 122 Diggs as of 4/4/08, when the podcast was taped. As of the time of this blog post, it has 261 diggs, most likely a result of promotion via the podcast. This number of diggs should have been enough to promote it to the homepage, but as per Kevin’s comment, age of the submission hasn’t allowed it to be promoted. It was originally submitted to Digg back on 3/20/08.

Although it’s hard to say what the time limitations are within the algorithm, I’m sticking with the 24 hour limit. This basically does confirm that it’s nearly impossible to get something promoted that’s at least a day old, no matter how many diggs it collects.

Article by Paul McDevitt

 

SMTrends Briefs

Yahoo! announced their 1st quarter numbers.

Steve Ballmer talks about not raising their bid for Yahoo! 

Udi Manber has been working on Web search since search was invented. This past week he gave some answers to 20 Questions.

 

Subscribe / Unsubscribe                                  Privacy Policy                         About Avenue A | Razorfish™

The editor of SMTrends is Joshua Palau.  Please send any questions, comments or topic suggestions to smtrends@avenuea-razorfish.com or mail to: SMTrends, 417 N. 8th Street, 2nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19123. For more information, you can call us toll free at 866-858-1993 or email us at info@avenuea-razorfish.com  2007 Avenue A | Razorfish (TM).

 
Permalink