It is a common assumption among those entering the online health space that the web sites dominating those rankings are impossible to beat. Additionally, there appears to be a feeling among some brand health marketers that their site will be ignored by the consumer. Many e-marketers believe that because of these two issues, they'll automatically need to settle for listings well below the top portals and information aggregators, as well as expect lower number of actual consumer visits coming from search engine results pages.
In the healthcare spectrum, consider WebMD as an example. The site is extremely trustworthy, ranks highly in search engines for many health terms, and has invaluable information. However, users don't necessarily rely on it for their source of endemic information and, according to JupiterResearch, only 19 percent have a favorite website in mind when searching health-based information. The remaining 81 percent is "up for grabs," and SEO can help. JupiterResearch also reports that about 65 percent of online health consumers click on search results because of the relevance of the title and description, while only 16 percent choose a result based on the trustworthiness of its source.
Proactively researching targeted keywords (based on commonly searched terms), creating enticing title and description tags, and optimizing web site copy will not only give a web site a chance to run with the big boys – it more importantly puts the emphasis back into the hands of those that matter most ... the consumer. This is especially true for branded terms; getting a branded site into the top 20 gives the consumer an option, and if the site’s title and description are more alluring and relevant to the search, chances are they’re clicking on that link instead of another.