Google launches a Wikipedia Killer 

In February of this year, I wrote an article titled Google Hates You, Wikipedia. The article focused on the announcement of Google Knol and the ramifications it would have on Wikipedia. Overall my assessment was that instead of being happy to organize the world’s information, Google was now getting into the game of keeping high-ranking content within their network.

Taking a page out of the About.com Guides model, Knol will have a single editor who is an expert in a topic. Google believes that knowing that a doctor has authored the Knol on Diabetes will make it a stronger entry then one from Wikipedia. While on the surface this looks like a nice compromise from the anonymously authored content one gets from Wikipedia, there are several challenges that will be important to watch over time:

What if a Knol-er prefers one company or course of action over another?
I have Type 1 Diabetes. My doctor believes in insulin pump therapy and also tends to recommend products from Lifescan.

If she were to write a Knol on diabetes, she may talk more favorably about insulin pumps and Lifescan glucose meters because she has had the best experience with them. She may inadvertently present the material in a way that may not provide the entire picture.

What about SEO favoritism?
Since a Knol will have a Google domain, it could presumably rank higher than non-Google pages based on their algorithm.  The easy to use templates that Google provides also are straight out of an SEO best practices guidebook.

Take the Knol on Buttermilk Pancakes. The author, Scott Jenson has no biography in Knol. I don’t know if he is a chef or just makes good pancakes. Yet his knoll ranks #4 for “buttermilk pancakes” ahead of trusted, but not optimized experts such Martha Stewart or Country Living. Why not just create a separate knol.com domain and not have it affiliated with Google?

While there are flaws with Wikipedia, there has to be a better way for Google to get involved in this space without looking as if they are trying increase AdWords distribution. I wonder if Wikipedia just agreed to accept AdWords on their pages, would Google just scrap the whole Knol project?

Article by Joshua Palau

 

Google Testing Out Digg-like Search Results

Google is currently testing out a Digg-like interface that will allow the wisdom of crowds to help inform its search results. While they have been working on this for quite some time, a recent video demonstrates a much more mature version than previously seen. If the small, random sample of users given access to these features like the new Digg-like interface, then it is likely that it will graduate to become a Google Labs product and potentially a part of Google's standard search results.

The new features include all the major features of Digg. This includes voting results up or down, and individual user profiles to associate them with their comments. Individual comments can also be voted up or down. What is most significant here is the fact that Google allows the votes to push individual results to the first page. Although this is still in a very early state of testing, it appears to indicate that Google's future intent is to utilize user votes as another factor in their algorithm for ranking standard search results. Earlier in March, there were even rumors that Google and Microsoft might try to purchase Digg, but that never came to fruition.

Yahoo! has also been experimenting with adding "suggestion boards" to many of their web properties, such as Yahoo! Answers, Shopping, News, and more. Most notably, their social news site, Yahoo! Buzz, has recently gained momentum in social news circles, with an estimated 7 million people using the site. However, there isn't as clear an indication that Yahoo! is going to incorporate user voting to influence its standard search rankings.

MSN has also beta released a "Reporter" service in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Norway since last year that incorporates Digg-features of "kicking up" or "dumping down" social news results. However, it does not appear that these features will be a part of standard search rankings anytime soon.

While the concept of incorporating votes from the masses may help provide better search results, and bring more of the "human element" that other search engines like Mahalo are promoting, there are some pitfalls. Blackhats and spammers abusing the system and allowing a few powerful voters to influence the rankings of all results is one such pitfall.

Article by Thanh Duong

 

Strategic Link Building

One of the more mysterious SEO tactics is Link Building. While many marketers understand that links are important, they do not understand the strategy behind it. SEO Analyst Ron Sansone discussesthe strategic approach to natural backlink expansion. In part one of this feature, Ron provides an introduction to the subject matter as well as the mechanics of Link Building

Introduction
When Larry Page developed the concept of PageRank, he understood an inherent truth about online interaction. At its heart, the internet is a system of disparate pages and domains, each with its own purpose and agenda. As choice expands beyond the reach of manual evaluation, the only way to gauge the worth and value of a website is to assess its connections.

One’s relationships and associations have a major impact on public image in both the online and offline world. From local assemblymen to global e-commerce sites, connections add much to the public perception of prominent figures. Seeking the approval of trusted authorities is vital to any campaign for positive top-of-mind awareness.

In the online space, we refer to such authoritative connections as links, and in truth they are a unique hybrid of technical execution and personal relationship. The weight of links are highly important to a search engine’s evaluation of websites; a link from a respected source indicates not only that the material of a site is relevant, but also that the linking site vouches (to some degree) for the target page. The link is more than just a device for the transference of popularity or weight, it is a sign of trust that fundamentally bonds one source to another, ideally creating a relevant pathway for the end user.

Once one understands the technical aspects of link development, the focus of the service becomes the cultivation of sound business relationships. Part analysis, part public relations, link development is a practice of skilled strategic communication for the modern era. By operating within the guidelines of ethical search engine optimization (SEO), and viewing the online audience as a logical extension of the offline universe, a website’s backlinks and authority can be naturally expanded to benefit a company’s (or individual’s) search engine presentation.

Monitoring Metrics in Site Evaluation
Though many argue the value of current Google Toolbar PageRank numbers, the importance of online authority shall never truly wane. As Jonah Stein, founder of ItsTheROI, observed at the 2008 SMX Advanced Conference session on analytics, search engine crawl frequency may soon be considered the “new PageRank,” an indicator of search engine trust. There is strong logic to this argument, as it hints at a shift towards the increased importance of search engines.

If crawl frequency is the new measure of a site’s importance, the metric suggests both that the engines themselves must be viewed as authorities and that prominent placement in them is vital to online success – which undoubtedly rings true for commercial websites. While arguments can be made in defense of either PageRank or crawl frequency, both are loose indicators of trust and warrant monitoring. We shall refer to these as trust metrics.

Before a link development strategy can be prepared for any website, the target site must be evaluated by its trust metrics, depth of pages, domain age, topical category and current number of backlinks. All of these figures affect the amount and type of link relationships that should be pursued moving forward. Based on this preliminary evaluation, a website may be placed across a linking continuum, ranging from low to high quality links, in order to determine which class of links may still be of use for development. These link tiers serve as the cornerstone of link building mechanics and as a basic indicator of a site’s backlink progression.

 
 

Subscribe / Unsubscribe                                  Privacy Policy                         About Avenue A | Razorfish™

The editor of SMTrends is Joshua Palau.  Please send any questions, comments or topic suggestions to smtrends@avenuea-razorfish.com or mail to: SMTrends, 417 N. 8th Street, 2nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19123. For more information, you can call us toll free at 866-858-1993 or email us at info@avenuea-razorfish.com  2007 Avenue A | Razorfish (TM).

 
Permalink